Tips for Mounting Security Cameras

One of the greatest barriers to securing Garden Squares is the difficulty inpositioning security cameras. In this article we explore the methods wetypically use to mount and maintain power to cameras.

This Plane Tree's trunk consumed a rusting Dummy Camera,that has also been blocked by a climbing shrub.

Challenges of Mounting Cameras in Garden Squares

Placing Cameras in Communal Gardens can be particularly challenging, particularly because they are:

  • Sensitive environments: The Urban Trees in Garden Squares are important assets, heavily protected by local authorities. Tree Protection Officers are unlikely to support mounting cameras directly to Trees, particularly because even Mature Trees (like the 180 year old Plane Tree pictured) will grow and break/consume mounts over time.
  • Changing environments: Cameras may be blocked by the growth of existing trees / shrubs, or the placement of new trees/shrubs over time. Tree Protection Rules (BS5837) make clear that Trees should not need to be pruned to accommodate the position of CCTV cameras. For that reason spending large amounts of money on static camera locations is illogical.
  • Visually Precious:
    Many Garden Squares have been meticulously cared for over many generations, therefore incongruous camera equipment / support infrastructure can be met with fierce opposition.

Our Solution: Flexible Tree Mounts

Our favoured approach is to attach each Camera Mount to a rust-proof Aluminium Mount, that are held against a tree with a Camouflage Turnbuckle Strap, offering many benefits, not least:1.

  1. Low Visual Impact: The mount and the strap blend-well with the vast majority of trees. Cameras and their mounts can be coloured for less visual impact (though typically it helps for the camera itself to be noticeable for deterrent purposes)
  2. Non-Invasive: From our experience the majority of Tree Protection Officers object to invasive mounts that penetrate the bark of trees(even if rust-proof fixings are used). Our straps and aluminium mounts don’t penetrate or damage the tree.
  3. Fully-Flexible: The mounts can be adjusted/removed simply by loosening/undoing the turnbuckle strap, allowing for them to be adjusted/relocated as the Garden changes around them. The equipment can be installed on trees of practically any size.
  4. Non-Permanent: If the environment around the cameras changes, so to obstruct their field of view, they can simply be moved.
  5. Fast Installations: Whilst some preparation work is required (toattach the camera mount to the aluminium block), the time requiredto install the camera onsite is kept to an absolute minimum.

Running Cables to the Cameras

For most installations we suggest using cameras that transmit their footage wirelessly, avoiding the need to run thick cameras to each unit.

Wireless Cameras can be powered/recharged via thin cables that are both innocuous, and cheap to replace if damaged/vandalised.

Cables can either be connected to outdoor sockets, or run to weatherproof boxes where Gardeners / volunteers can recharge the cameras by connecting the trailing wires in the weatherproof boxes to power banks.

Powering Cameras with Solar Panels

The aluminium mounts we recommend can also support a solar panel and camera on the same mount.

They’re great in theory, though in practice solar panels in Communal Gardens rarely provide sufficient charging power year-round for (low consumption) motion-activated cameras, because:

  • Few places in Communal Gardens receive 8+ hours a day ofsunshine, owing to the shade cast by trees / buildings
  • Further charging deterioration can be caused by leaf-fall, plane tree trichomes, birds mess, etc
  • Motion-events can be frequent in Gardens, and therefore the power consumed by motion-cameras, tend to be quite high (moving branches, animals, branches). Even if the cameras are set to filter-out these events, the lion’s share power is consumed by the motion sensor being triggered, rather than saving the recording.

Placing Cameras at the Correct Height

For as long as there have been security cameras, there has been a debate about how high they should be positioned. Higher cameras are less likely to be stolen/vandalised, but lower cameras are more likely to capture more detailed, useful images of the suspected culprit.

From those interested – IPVM have published a detailed study into the impact of camera mounting heights.

Motion cameras add a another level of camera to the debate, as above a certain height, the performance of the motion sensor deteriorates.

On balance, our preference is to place the camera just out of reach of a potential vandal, at between 10-12ft above ground.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts